
Originally Posted by
Nathan N.
I'm not using weasel words. We know some people don't like prologues and either skip them or feel like it's a chore to read them. Based on that, an author has three choices:
A: Write the prologue knowing that a percentage of readers will skip it and miss out on useful information.
B: Write a prologue that doesn't include any useful information.
C: Don't write a prologue.
The safest route is C, because the author has a much better idea of how their book is being read and can provide the readers with the information they need in a controlled fashion.
B is a waste of everyone's time. Why write a prologue that serves no purpose?
A is fine, but does mean the writer has to accept some percentage (and we don't know how much) of readers will miss out on key information.
In an ideal world, readers would behave and always read the damn prologue. But they don't, so it's up to the writer to weigh up whether the benefits of a prologue outweighs the negatives.