-
Re: Possessive S
Yes, that's the rule. The exception to the use of s's with names ending in s is for ancient names. For example, you would write Jesus' or Germanicus', but for a name like Agnes, the correct form is Agnes's.
I have no idea why ancient names receive this privilege.
I just know that's the rule that shows up in my grammar books.
And it would be goodness' sake, not goodness's sake. I'd have to look up the rule for that one, but I believe that's the correct form. Right, June?
Jeanne
-
Advertisement
-
Re: Possessive S
Patrick:
Re goodness: Exactly! But it only applies to "sake" and not, say, "seat."
Re Jesus: You got it right, according to Chicago, but it's not because he gets special treatment. It's for the same reason as "goodness." Three s's lined up due to "sake." (Again, per "Chicago")
Rogue: Having a special rule for "ancients" is an AP and a Strunk & White thing. (S&W have no authority in printing world, though. Neither papers nor books use them as their official style.)
Chicago has a rule for "names like Euripides," but it doesn't apply to Jesus.
Chicago:
Jesus's words
BUT
Jesus' sake
BUT
Jesus's seat
AP:
Jesus' words
Jesus' sake
Jesus' seat
BUT
The boss's chair
The boss' seat
For Chicago, though, at the end of all their many rules is a note that says, basically, "if all this is too confusing, just add the apostrophe and s to everything." Which makes all the pro-Angnes's people as right as anyone and perhaps wiser, too!
I guess my point is even the rule makers struggle with this stuff!
-
Re: Possessive S
The boss' seat
And, just to be sure, when speaking this particular phrase, we do pronounce it "boss-es seat," right?
P.S. remind me to not use Jesus or boss or seat or words or sake in any of my writing--in any combination!
-
Re: Possessive S
Rogue: Having a special rule for "ancients" is an AP and a Strunk & White thing. (S&W have no authority in printing world, though. Neither papers nor books use them as their official style.)
Guess I don't get my gold star then. Dang.
-
Re: Possessive S
Didn't see yours before I hit "post," Jeanne. I don't know how many other books state that "ancients" stuff as a "rule," but "Chicago" doesn't see it quite the same way. And since that's the one the publishing houses usually follow, I don't bother trying to take sides.
My rule: Don't even try to commit it all to memory. Just check "Chicago" if writing a book and "AP" if writing an article.
-
Re: Possessive S
P.S. remind me to not use Jesus or boss or seat or words or sake in any of my writing--in any combination! 
My thoughts exactly!! Sheesh!!
-
Re: Possessive S
Patrick: Re pronunciation. I don't know for sure. But that's how I say it.
-
Re: Possessive S
Thanks for the inspiration, everyone, just when I needed a blog topic!
blog
(In case my hyperlinking fails, it's at www.conjugatevisits.blogspot.com)
-
Re: Possessive S
Too funny, June! Short, sweet, definitely to the point over there. Leaves no room for misunderstanding - well, sortof. ;-)
-
Re: Possessive S
Thanks.
Some people find the insanity of it all frustrating. Not me. I think it's a relief. Like, "Thank heaven I'm NOT supposed to know all this stuff off the top of my head."
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules